User talk:Hazard-SJ
Hello! Welcome to my user talk page!
- [History↑]
Contents
| Thread title | Replies | Last modified |
|---|---|---|
| Desysop | 3 | 01:38, 7 March 2012 |
| Delete | 1 | 03:02, 28 January 2012 |
| requests | 3 | 02:25, 18 November 2011 |
Hello, I've removed your sysop flag per this incident. It's one month old, but people here can't be forced to monitor this wiki 24h to ensure it's left functioning. If you disagree with other users good-faith usage of the wiki, you should open a discussion about the wiki's purpose, not throw your permissions against them.
I don't believe this was entirely relevant, as I believe I acted as an administrator should act. I don't believe it is appropriate in any condition to undo another sysop's actions without speaking with the sysop first, so I undid it and notified him. Apparently everyone has forgotten about what Devunt did and only remembers my actions. :O
Hi, Can you please delete this, kindly regards.
Actually, I believe it should be kept for reference (as archives are). I reverted your blanking and completed the closing.
I am pretty sure you can close such Wikipedia:Requests/Permissions/Erdemaslancan next time ;) thanks
I'd love to, but I thought that was up to the bureaucrats. Also, it wasn't transcluded unto Wikipedia:Requests/Permissions. Should it be considered a request still?
hm, depends, in case that it's invalid and transcluded, you could probably close it, no matter if you are crat or not (imho I don't know why you don't have access to the tool, it shouldn't be problem on test wiki, which is only for testing and things like permissions, doesn't matter) in case it's invalid and not transcluded, maybe notify the person that their request is not considered valid on their talk? Or do whatever else you think it's correct... thanks
Because we "don't need any more bureaucrats", according to my last two RfBs.
