User talk:Hazard-SJ

Jump to navigation Jump to search

About this board

Hello! Welcome to my user talk page!

Petrb (talkcontribs)
Hazard-SJ (talkcontribs)

I'd love to, but I thought that was up to the bureaucrats. Also, it wasn't transcluded unto Wikipedia:Requests/Permissions. Should it be considered a request still?

Petrb (talkcontribs)

hm, depends, in case that it's invalid and transcluded, you could probably close it, no matter if you are crat or not (imho I don't know why you don't have access to the tool, it shouldn't be problem on test wiki, which is only for testing and things like permissions, doesn't matter) in case it's invalid and not transcluded, maybe notify the person that their request is not considered valid on their talk? Or do whatever else you think it's correct... thanks

QuimGil (talkcontribs)

(Just a test, please ignore.)

Reply to "requests"
Quiddity (talkcontribs)

One more test.

Hazard-SJ (talkcontribs)

A reply by yet another user

Reply to "Test post"

Greetings! You have been volunteered...

2
Quiddity (WMF) (talkcontribs)

Hi. My apologies for introducing myself this way (I'm Quiddity, the longterm editor and now Community Liaison working with the Collaboration/Flow team), but, as this is the most used LQT page on this wiki, I've suggested this location as the most useful test subject for the LQT -> mw:Flow conversion test... It helps that Nemo_bis and Petrb are watchlisting it, so can also help detect any problems that might be encountered. Ideally, everything will go smoothly, and you'll barely notice a thing. A few more test posts will follow this one...

[test edit]

Reply to "Greetings! You have been volunteered..."
Nemo bis (talkcontribs)

Hello, I've removed your sysop flag per this incident. It's one month old, but people here can't be forced to monitor this wiki 24h to ensure it's left functioning. If you disagree with other users good-faith usage of the wiki, you should open a discussion about the wiki's purpose, not throw your permissions against them.

Hazard-SJ (talkcontribs)

I don't believe this was entirely relevant, as I believe I acted as an administrator should act. I don't believe it is appropriate in any condition to undo another sysop's actions without speaking with the sysop first, so I undid it and notified him. Apparently everyone has forgotten about what Devunt did and only remembers my actions. :O

Reply to "Desysop"
Katarighe (talkcontribs)

Hi, Can you please delete this, kindly regards.

Hazard-SJ (talkcontribs)

Actually, I believe it should be kept for reference (as archives are). I reverted your blanking and completed the closing.

Reply to "Delete"
There are no older topics